Student feedback

Assessment feedback questionnaire

The Assessment feedback questionnaire is focused on Bachelor and Master students, it consists of fourteen questions, plus two background questions to gather demographic information.

Participation and results

How to participate?

Participate at the end of every semester.

When and where are the results available?

Instructors who have received at least one feedback response for their course will get a report. The reports are made available online for instructors the day after the jury d’examen of the respective programme. No results are shared until all exam grades have been submitted and approved.

Purpose

Its purpose is to:

  • to contribute to the development and maintenance of high-quality learning experiences for all students;
  • to establish an easily accessible and regularly occurring space for constructive feedback;
  • to enhance the fairness and transparency of graded assessments.
  • to understand student perceptions and experiences with assessment in their courses.

Useful documents

History and feedback campaigns

The Assessment feedback questionnaire (formerly referred to as Fairness in assessment questionnaire) was first implemented at the University in the academic year 2022/2023.

Assessment feedback – Summer semester 2023-2024

Some facts for the summer semester 2023-2024

  • 1673 students provided feedback on assessment practices.
  • Positive feedback:
    • Assessments are perceived as fair and closely aligned with the content covered in the course.
    • Overall appreciation for instructors who demonstrate dedication and make the course enjoyable and informative.
    • Value placed on courses that facilitate meaningful discussions and offer a motivating and supportive learning atmosphere.
    • Frequent assignments and detailed feedback are found to be useful for enhancing students’ learning and understanding of the material.
  • Areas for improvement:
    • Align exams with course content, avoiding discrepancies between taught content and assessment questions, and ensure transparency of assessment criteria.
    • Provide adequate guidance and resources for students to complete their assessments effectively, including supplementary materials such as revision sessions and tutorials.
    • Balance and manage the workload throughout the semester, avoiding last-minute assignments and excessive pressure around exam periods.
    • Clearly communicate course expectations, grading criteria and assignment details, using multiple channels to keep students informed.

Assessment feedback – Winter semester 2023-2024

Some facts for the winter semester 2023-2024

  • 338 students provided feedback on assessment practices.
  • Positive feedback:
    • Clear and engaging course content explanations by instructors.
    • Transparent and aligned assessment systems are positively valued. This helps students feel more confident in their learning process.
    • Instructor accessibility and responsiveness fosters a positive learning environment.
  • Areas for improvement:
    • Frustration arises when agreed-upon expectations are not met, leading to a sense of injustice among students.
    • Group work requires more support and clear instructions.
    • Lack of clarity in course content and absence of evaluation criteria contribute to student dissatisfaction.
    • High workload in some courses make it challenging for student to keep up.

Assessment feedback – Summer semester 2022-2023

Some facts for the summer semester 2022-2023

  • 689 students gave feedback on assessment practices.
  • Positive feedback:
    • High level of fairness in assessment procedures.
    • Extensive use of assessment tasks to guide and inform learning.
    • Constructive comments and detailed suggestions for improvement.
  • Areas for improvement:
    • Desire for more information on assessment criteria.
    • Openness of instructors to discuss grading systems and reflect course content in assessments.

Assessment feedback – Winter semester 2022-2023

Some facts for the winter semester 2022-2023

  • 641 students shared their views on assessment practices.
  • Positive feedback:
    • Instructors were transparent about assessments designed and grading.
    • Fair application assessment criteria for all students.
  • Areas for improvement:
    • Group work assessment needs better explanation.
    • More time needed for assessment tasks.
    • Better communication with instructors on grading criteria and assessment rules desired.
    • Students seek more feedback and explanations on their submitted tasks.

Share this