Event

INDIGO Project Annual Conference

  • Location

    University of Freiburg

    Fahnenbergplatz

    79085, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

  • Topic(s)
    Law
  • Type(s)
    Conferences, Free of charge, In-person event, Virtual event

On September 29-30 at the University of Freiburg took place the INDIGO Project third big come-together – the second hybrid type internal annual Conference.

The main purpose of the two-days Conference was to intensively discuss the draft papers in order to realise the peer-review and to provide in-depth feedback for the authors. In order to achieve this aim effectively, all of the draft papers and reports were spread between the participants in advance.

On the first day, the participants presented the draft papers intended as chapters for the final INDIGO Project book. Each draft paper presentation was followed by a commentary provided by the commentator. Afterwards followed feedback from the other participants and broader discussions on the draft paper.

The first panel presented on general framework aspects such as Accountability of Cyber-Delegation in European Union Public Law (Prof. Herwig Hofmann) and Algorithms, Automation and Administrative Procedure at EU Level (Prof. Oriol Mir et al).

The following panels (panel 2 – 4) were composed of the presentations of the draft papers build on previous INDIGO work, included on case studies in the various selected EU policy fields impacted by the automated decision making and automatization: EU Border Control, Regulations by Information & RegTech, Political Advertising, Digital Health Infrastructure, Digital Services and AI Systems in the Single EU Market.

Considering the latest EU legislative developments (AI Act proposal, DSA, DMA, GDPR, etc.), the second day was dedicated for the comparative insights in the national developments of the EU Member States. Of interest were national legislative activities, judiciary practice (case law) and soft law concerning automation in the administrative procedures concerning AI/sophisticated algorithms in public decision making.

First professor Paul Craig presented Model Rules on Impact Assessment of Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems Used by Public Administration.

It was followed by the national reports of Italian (Prof. Diana-Urania Galetta), Spanish (Prof. Eduardo Gamero), Austrian (Prof. Franz Merli), Estonian (Prof. Ivo Pilving) and Swedish (Prof. Jane Reichel) perspectives concerning automation in administrative procedures concerning AI/sophisticated algorithms in public decision making. The presentations of the reports were followed by discussions facilitating the mapping of the tendencies of national legislative, judiciary and soft law responses to the automatization, digitalization and the (semi)automated decision making or AI/sophisticated algorithm use by public administration.

We thank to all the participants for the fruitful and exciting exchange!

Programme
Thursday, 29 September 2022
  • 09.00 – 09.15

    Welcome and introduction

    • Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider, University of Freiburg (Host & PI)
    • Prof. Herwig Hofmann, University of Luxembourg (Project Leader)
  • 09.15 – 11.00

    Panel 1 (hybrid)

    Chair: Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider, University of Freiburg

    Automated decision making in public law

    Prof. Herwig Hofmann, University of Luxembourg

    Comments by Prof. Deirdre Curtin, European University Institute, Florence

    Discussion

    Algorithms, automation and administrative procedure at EU level

    Prof. Oriol Mir Puigpelat (et al.), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona

    Comments by Prof. Sofia Ranchordás, University of Groningen

    Discussion

  • 11.30 – 13.00

    Panel 2 (hybrid)

    Chair: Prof. Herwig Hofmann, University of Luxembourg

    Automated decision-making in the EU Border Control Context

    Prof. Franziska Boehm (et al.), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)

    Comments by Dr. Niovi Vavoula, Queen Mary University of London

    Discussion

    The Changing Nature of ‘Regulation by Information’ and the Rise of Regulatory Technologies

    Prof. Dirk Zetzsche, Dr. Felix Pflücke (et al.), University of Luxembourg

    Comments by Dr. Jannik Woxholth, University of Luxembourg

    Discussion

  • 13.00 – 14.30

    Lunch break

  • 14.30 – 15.30

    Panel 3

    Chair: Prof. Franziska Boehm, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)

    Influencing Decision-Making by Targeting Political Advertising

    Prof. Päivi Leino-Sandberg (et al.), University of Helsinki

    Comments by Dr. Judith Möller, University of Amsterdam

    Discussion

  • 16.00 – 17.45

    Panel 4 (hybrid)

    Chair: Prof. Oriol Mir Puigpelat, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona

    A Digital Health Infrastructure for cross-border Governance of communicable diseases

    Franka Enderlein, University of Freiburg

    Comments by Dirk Meusel, Unit Health Security, DG for Health and Food Safety, European Commission

    Discussion

    The new regulatory framework for Digital Services and AI systems in the EU Single Market

    Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider (et al.), University of Freiburg

    Comments by Prof. Joris van Hoboken, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Brussel

    Discussion

Friday, 30 September 2022
  • 09.45 – 10.45

    Panel 6: The Effect of Automated Decision Making Systems on Basic Principles in EU Public Law: A Comparative Perspective – I

    Chair: Prof. Herwig Hofmann, University of Luxembourg

    Automated Decision Making Systems in national Administrative Law

    Prof. Diana-Urania Galetta, University of Milan – An Italian Perspective

    Prof. Eduardo Gamero Casado, Pablo de Olavide University, Sevilla – A Spanish Perspective

    Discussion

  • 11.15 – 12.30

    Panel 7: The Effect of Automated Decision Making Systems on Basic Principles in EU Public Law: A Comparative Perspective – II

    Chair: Prof. Jacques Ziller, University of Pavia

    Automated Decision Making Systems in national Administrative Law

    Prof. Franz Merli, University of Vienna – An Austrian Perspective

    Prof. Ivo Pilving, University of Tartu/Supreme Court of Estonia – An Estonian Perspective

    Prof. Jane Reichel, University of Stockholm – A Swedish Perspective

    Discussion

  • 13.30 – 12.50

    Closing remarks

    • Prof. Herwig Hofmann, University of Luxembourg
    • Prof. Jens-Peter Schneider, University of Freiburg
In partnership with

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grand agreement No 822166.