{"id":1810,"date":"2022-09-19T14:05:01","date_gmt":"2022-09-19T12:05:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/"},"modified":"2022-09-19T14:05:01","modified_gmt":"2022-09-19T12:05:01","slug":"postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy","status":"publish","type":"events","link":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Postponed &#8211; Research Economic Seminar:  Inequality aversion for climate policy"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"wp-block-unilux-blocks-free-section section\"><div class=\"container xl:max-w-screen-xl\"><p>A sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.<\/p><p><\/p><\/div><\/section>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AbstractA sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1811,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"featured_image_focal_point":[],"show_featured_caption":false,"ulux_newsletter_groups":"","uluxPostTitle":"","uluxPrePostTitle":"","_trash_the_other_posts":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"event_start_date":"2022-11-22 13:00:00","event_end_date":"2022-11-22 14:00:00","event_speaker_name":"Stellio Del Campo, DEM, Universit\u00e9 du Luxembourg","event_speaker_link":"","event_is_online":false,"event_location":"Participation by invitation\r\n","event_street":"","event_location_link":"","event_zip_code":"","event_city":"","event_country":"LU"},"events-topic":[298],"events-type":[],"organisation":[137],"authorship":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.3 (Yoast SEO v22.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy - FDEF I Uni.lu<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"AbstractA sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"AbstractA sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FDEF FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uni.FDEF.lu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2026\/03\/03111953\/FDEF_SM-Profile_1600x1600px-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/\",\"name\":\"Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy - FDEF I Uni.lu\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2022\/09\/postponed_research_economic_seminar_inequality_aversion_for_climate_policy.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-19T12:05:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-09-19T12:05:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"AbstractA sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2022\/09\/postponed_research_economic_seminar_inequality_aversion_for_climate_policy.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2022\/09\/postponed_research_economic_seminar_inequality_aversion_for_climate_policy.jpg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":600},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fr\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Events\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/\",\"name\":\"FDEF\",\"description\":\"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance I Uni.lu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance I Universit\u00e9 du Luxembourg\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"FDEF - Universit\u00e9 du Luxembourg I Uni.lu\",\"alternateName\":\"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2026\/03\/03111953\/FDEF_SM-Profile_1600x1600px-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2026\/03\/03111953\/FDEF_SM-Profile_1600x1600px-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":2560,\"caption\":\"FDEF - Universit\u00e9 du Luxembourg I Uni.lu\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uni.FDEF.lu\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/showcase\/fdef-uni-lu\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy - FDEF I Uni.lu","description":"AbstractA sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy","og_description":"AbstractA sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/","og_site_name":"FDEF FR","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uni.FDEF.lu","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":2560,"url":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2026\/03\/03111953\/FDEF_SM-Profile_1600x1600px-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/","name":"Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy - FDEF I Uni.lu","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2022\/09\/postponed_research_economic_seminar_inequality_aversion_for_climate_policy.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-19T12:05:01+00:00","dateModified":"2022-09-19T12:05:01+00:00","description":"AbstractA sizeable body of literature on climate economics utilizes the notion of inequality aversion. We review and synthesize published estimates of inequality aversion to guide this literature. We review both axiomatic and empirical studies, accordingly our findings draw on different lines of evidence. In the former case, a variety of ethical principles underlie the recommendations for positive inequality aversion. The latter studies use various methods to present estimates based on some form of \u201crevealed ethics,\u201d for example by looking at existing progressive income tax-schedules or the level of foreign aid. Here we find strong support for the view that inequality aversion is positive (but potentially small) and very little support for any value larger than three. The vast majority of studies that look at domestic policies support values between one and two, whereas studies that look at foreign aid find lower values ranging from above zero to unity.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2022\/09\/postponed_research_economic_seminar_inequality_aversion_for_climate_policy.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2022\/09\/postponed_research_economic_seminar_inequality_aversion_for_climate_policy.jpg","width":800,"height":600},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/postponed-research-economic-seminar-inequality-aversion-for-climate-policy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance","item":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Events","item":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/events\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Postponed - Research Economic Seminar: Inequality aversion for climate policy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/","name":"FDEF","description":"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance I Uni.lu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance I Universit\u00e9 du Luxembourg","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#organization","name":"FDEF - Universit\u00e9 du Luxembourg I Uni.lu","alternateName":"Facult\u00e9 de Droit, d\u2019\u00c9conomie et de Finance","url":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2026\/03\/03111953\/FDEF_SM-Profile_1600x1600px-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2026\/03\/03111953\/FDEF_SM-Profile_1600x1600px-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":2560,"caption":"FDEF - Universit\u00e9 du Luxembourg I Uni.lu"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uni.FDEF.lu","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/showcase\/fdef-uni-lu\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/events\/1810"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/events"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/events"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/events\/1810\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"events-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/events-topic?post=1810"},{"taxonomy":"events-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/events-type?post=1810"},{"taxonomy":"organisation","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.uni.lu\/fdef-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/organisation?post=1810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}